I have an ember application using firebase as the database. At one point, I need my nodejs server to have authentication in order to read/write to the database.
If I don't need authentication, I could just do the following:
firebase = require('firebase')
// firebaseConfigGetter() returns my webAPI key and other stuff
firebase.initializeApp(apiKeys.FirebaseConfigGetter());
// Do Server Stuff
But when I do need authentication, I found two ways that work. Both of them use the private admin-sdk key. So the first thing I did was this:
Case 1
admin = require('firebase-admin')
// adminConfigGetter returns my private admin-sdk key and other stuff
admin.initializeApp(apiKeys.adminConfigGetter());
// Do Server Stuff
And that worked. But later on, I read here that this is also fine
Case 2
firebase = require('firebase')
firebase.initializeApp(apiKeys.adminConfigGetter());
// Do Server Stuff
Both give my server the authentication I need, but one of them utilizes require('firebase-admin')
whereas the other just does firebase = require('firebase')
. So I'm just curious: If I have all the authentication privileges I need by using Case 2, then what advantage is there of using Case 1? Does Firebase-Admin grant me something other than privileges?
Thanks!
via Wild dog
No comments:
Post a Comment